Thursday, January 05, 2006

Steyn on the greatest threat to Western Civ

Mark Steyn is one of my favorite political commentators, not only for his sharp wit and fine skill at skewering liberals, but also for his clarity, accuracy and readability. Go read his latest contribution to intellectual thought--it is phenomenal. Long, but worth it. Some highlights and basic points:
That's what the war [on terror]'s about: our lack of civilizational confidence. As a famous Arnold Toynbee quote puts it: "Civilizations die from suicide, not murder"--as can be seen throughout much of "the Western world" right now. The progressive agenda--lavish social welfare, abortion, secularism, multiculturalism--is collectively the real suicide bomb. Take multiculturalism. The great thing about multiculturalism is that it doesn't involve knowing anything about other cultures--the capital of Bhutan, the principal exports of Malawi, who cares? All it requires is feeling good about other cultures. It's fundamentally a fraud, and I would argue was subliminally accepted on that basis. Most adherents to the idea that all cultures are equal don't want to live in anything but an advanced Western society. Multiculturalism means your kid has to learn some wretched native dirge for the school holiday concert instead of getting to sing "Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer" or that your holistic masseuse uses techniques developed from Native American spirituality, but not that you or anyone you care about should have to live in an African or Native American society. It's a quintessential piece of progressive humbug.
...
The old definition of a nanosecond was the gap between the traffic light changing in New York and the first honk from a car behind. The new definition is the gap between a terrorist bombing and the press release from an Islamic lobby group warning of a backlash against Muslims. In most circumstances, it would be considered appallingly bad taste to deflect attention from an actual "hate crime" by scaremongering about a purely hypothetical one. Needless to say, there is no campaign of Islamophobic hate crimes. If anything, the West is awash in an epidemic of self-hate crimes. A commenter on Tim Blair's Web site in Australia summed it up in a note-perfect parody of a Guardian headline: "Muslim Community Leaders Warn of Backlash from Tomorrow Morning's Terrorist Attack." Those community leaders have the measure of us.
...
Radical Islam is what multiculturalism has been waiting for all along.
...
That's the wonderful thing about multiculturalism: You can choose which side of the war you want to fight on. When the draft card arrives, just tick "home team" or "enemy," according to taste.
...
The annexation by government of most of the key responsibilities of life--child-raising, taking care of your elderly parents--has profoundly changed the relationship between the citizen and the state. At some point--I would say socialized health care is a good marker--you cross a line, and it's very hard then to persuade a citizenry enjoying that much government largesse to cross back. In National Review recently, I took issue with that line Gerald Ford always uses to ingratiate himself with conservative audiences: "A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have." Actually, you run into trouble long before that point: A government big enough to give you everything you want still isn't big enough to get you to give anything back. That's what the French and German political classes are discovering.
...
The default mode of our elites is that anything that happens--from terrorism to tsunamis--can be understood only as deriving from the perniciousness of Western civilization.
...
[Preserving the West and fighting Islamic expansion] ought to be the left's issue. I'm a conservative--I'm not entirely on board with the Islamist program when it comes to beheading sodomites and so on, but I agree Britney Spears dresses like a slut: I'm with Mullah Omar on that one. Why then, if your big thing is feminism or abortion or gay marriage, are you so certain that the cult of tolerance will prevail once the biggest demographic in your society is cheerfully intolerant? Who, after all, are going to be the first victims of the West's collapsed birthrates? Even if one were to take the optimistic view that Europe will be able to resist the creeping imposition of Sharia currently engulfing Nigeria, it remains the case that the Muslim world is not notable for setting much store by "a woman's right to choose," in any sense.
The greater threat to the left's "progressive" social agenda is not the right, but Islamic expansion. Steyn notes:
By prioritizing a "woman's right to choose," Western women are delivering their societies into the hands of fellows far more patriarchal than a 1950s sitcom dad. If any of those women marching for their "reproductive rights" still have babies, they might like to ponder demographic realities: A little girl born today will be unlikely, at the age of 40, to be free to prance around demonstrations in Eurabian Paris or Amsterdam chanting "Hands off my bush!"...Bottom line for [insert crazed pro-abortion lefty here]: There are worse things than John Ashcroft out there.
...
Since the president unveiled the so-called Bush Doctrine--the plan to promote liberty throughout the Arab world--innumerable "progressives" have routinely asserted that there's no evidence Muslims want liberty and, indeed, that Islam is incompatible with democracy. If that's true, it's a problem not for the Middle East today but for Europe the day after tomorrow. According to a poll taken in 2004, over 60% of British Muslims want to live under Shariah--in the United Kingdom. If a population "at odds with the modern world" is the fastest-breeding group on the planet--if there are more Muslim nations, more fundamentalist Muslims within those nations, more and more Muslims within non-Muslim nations, and more and more Muslims represented in more and more transnational institutions--how safe a bet is the survival of the "modern world"?

Not good.
, , , , , , , ,

5 Comments:

Blogger Temujin said...

That has to be one of his most linked-to pieces. If only more Canadians were like Steyn!

PS... post more :-)

1/06/2006 4:43 PM  
Blogger A Wiser Man Than I said...

I have to second Clay here. The piece was solid but for that faux pas. Pat Buchanan has been beating this dead horse for years. We can only hope that with Europe's demise we Americans--and Canadians--learn and save ourselves. We still have some time.

1/07/2006 5:58 PM  
Blogger Seth said...

Perhaps the term "Bush Doctrine" is too specific to encompass to the administration's push for democracy worldwide. Fine.

Simply edit the sentence to begin, "Since the president unveiled the plan to promote democracy throughout the Arab world..." and Steyn's point stands.

1/08/2006 12:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The world's going to hell in a handbasket. The future won't be Muslim or Christian based civilization, as we're headed for a new dark age with no civilization. The masses will expire, and most of the survivors will live as ignorant, illiterate peasants. Only a few of us are endowed with the required level of intelligence, will, and ability to inflict constructive violence to rise above the herd and become the ruling class of the future. I don't know if it will happen in my lifetime, but I'm prepared mentally and physically for the day when the new Barbarians are called upon to lead. For now, we should enjoy the ride before society crashes and burns like a Ferrari slamming into a concrete barrier.

In the spirit of the above statement: I'm going to do another line and nail the hardbody in my shower (once she finishes freshening up and "grooming" to my specifications). Enjoy the moment before it vanishes, and... feed your id.

-Digby

1/08/2006 3:34 AM  
Blogger Seth said...

Hmmm...

Quite an interesting philosophy of life you got there!

1/08/2006 11:04 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home